Marlon Wayans Condemns CA Court Decision to Reopen Cleveland Case
Marlon Wayans is going back under a legal microscope for comparing a man to the “Family Guy” character Cleveland Brown a few years back … and he ain’t happy about it.
We ran into the comedian and actor Monday at LAX, where we got his thoughts on a potentially momentous decision by the CA Supreme Court to reexamine a lower court’s 2015 ruling that he did NOT do anything wrong with the viral burn.
You’ll recall … while filming for the movie, “A Haunted House 2,” Marlon tweeted that Pierre Daniel — an extra in the flick — looked like a dead ringer for Cleveland.
Pierre sued Marlon and the production company for the move shortly thereafter, claiming that not only had Marlon racially harassed him with the tweet … but he also allegedly made a habit of roasting him on the set, which he says caused him great harm.
At the time, a judge said that Pierre did, in fact, look like Cleveland … and, more importantly, that Marlon’s antics were protected free speech. An appellate court upheld that ruling in 2017, saying Marlon’s tweet was kosher if that was his creative process as a comic.
Now … the CA Supreme Court has weighed in, telling the robes below them to reconsider.
He tells us that if you’re coming to work with a comedian, you gotta be ready for the jokes to fly — it’s what he does for a living, after all. MW also says this could possibly keep comics in courthouses forever going forward … suggesting it amounts to censorship.
Marlon even says this Pierre fella should be thanking him for putting him on the map … and “upgrading” him beyond just an extra in a movie. We’ll let him explain for himself.
The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes.The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.